BlahX3 Report This Comment Date: August 27, 2012 04:00PM
It is a sculpture, not a fossil. It's bullshit and it has been proven to be
impossible for humans or any primate to be that large. The bone structure could
not support the weight.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: August 27, 2012 04:32PM
are you sure about that, Bluf-i-pedia? you might want to look it up.
BlahX3 Report This Comment Date: August 27, 2012 08:38PM
I have looked it up a long time ago. It is bio-mechanically impossible for a
human being to be that large. Look it up for yourself, it's called the
square-cube law.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: August 27, 2012 09:09PM
it may pssibly be impossible for human anatomical structure, but what about
Annunaki?
BlahX3 Report This Comment Date: August 27, 2012 09:34PM
It is not possibly impossible it IS actually impossible. Look up the
square-cube law. It's not that difficult to understand.
I don't know, maybe when the aliens come pick up JG he'll let us know.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27/08/2012 09:35PM by BlahX3.
AnonSackman Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2012 03:58PM
Fossil you can ask the Anunnaki when they show up at the end of the year. There
is so much evidence (as in your other photos) that civilisations existed before
the last Ice Age but still the academic world refuses to believe. If it doesn't
fit into the accepted scheme of things then let's just ignore it.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2012 04:08PM
that is the theology for most paleo-anthropologists because they need pretty
concrete proof of an existence to get grant money to pursue further. it is not
my thinking however, almost everything started as a theory or a possible
conspiracy theory.
BlahX3 Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2012 04:45PM
If it's a conspiracy theory I'm confident Fossil would be all over it
I'd welcome scientific discoveries that would validate mythology and theology.
Not very much of that happens (if any) and I don't really think it is due to
lack of funding entirely, although I do agree that the academic world seems to
be very closed-minded about the possibilities. It is more due to a lack of being
open-minded and rejecting things as a matter of habit even before possibly
investigating them. In my mind the same holds true for theologists and
conspiracy theorists and politicians. People resist change. On the other hand it
is foolish to base a belief on information and conjecture that has not been
validated by accurate investigation and documentation and testing.