Onyma Report This Comment Date: January 17, 2022 01:00AM
Hey genius, this is talking about immunotherapy treatments. Immunotherapy is
NOT the same as a Vaccine, they are completely distinct from each other in
methodologies and intent. Once again showing your complete lack of research and
understanding.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 17/01/2022 01:01AM by Onyma.
pulse Report This Comment Date: January 17, 2022 03:23AM
Shush, it doesn't support a bullshit narrative if you try to make sense of it.
Anon Report This Comment Date: January 17, 2022 05:43AM
Uploader here, as some people don't have basic comprehension, let me give you a
hint: read the words after "immunotherapy".
Now for the really bad news:
"The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle shows the COVID spike protein
gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and
then accumulates in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the
liver, adrenal glands and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.
In a study published in Nature Neuroscience, lab animals injected with purified
spike protein into their bloodstream developed cardiovascular problems. The
spike protein also crossed the blood-brain barrier and caused damage to the
brain.
>Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors
that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels, Bridle said.
“When that happens it can do one of two things. It can either cause platelets
to clump, and that can lead to clotting — that’s exactly why we’ve been
seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to
bleeding,” he added.
Whelan was concerned the mRNA vaccine technology utilized by Pfizer and Moderna
had “the potential to cause microvascular injury (inflammation and small blood
clots called microthrombi) to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that
were not assessed in the safety trials.”
And:
"There are many lessons to learn from the way studies are conducted and
results are presented. With the use of only RRRs, and omitting ARRs, reporting
bias is introduced, which affects the interpretation of vaccine efficacy.
When communicating about vaccine efficacy, especially for public health
decisions such as choosing the type of vaccines to purchase and deploy, having a
full picture of what the data actually show is important, and ensuring
comparisons are based on the combined evidence that puts vaccine trial results
in context and not just looking at one summary measure, is also important. Such
decisions should be properly informed by detailed understanding of study
results, requiring access to full datasets and independent scrutiny and
analyses."
Plus the documentation presented to promote these vaccines deliberately ignored
ARR results in favour of RRR results, making them look more impressive. In
other words they used fraud. The real effectiveness:
AstraZeneca–Oxford: 1·3%
Moderna–NIH: 1.2%
Johnson & Johnson.: 1.2%
Gamaleya - Sputnik V: 0.93%
Pfizer - BioNTech: 0.84%
References:
[
www.thelancet.com]
[
childrenshealthdefense.org]
[
scitechdaily.com]
[
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
[
www.biorxiv.org]