I'm sorry, but that is completely wall-eyed. Aggression towards the western world on the part of the Isalmic Fundamentalists has been developing since the crusades.

You can't sit there and tell me Bush is responsible for all of it. He might be a catalyst, sure, but he inherited a legacy of hate spawned since way before America even existed.

If you'd like specific examples, I'd provide them, but arguing that Bush is somehow the sole cause of the aggression directed towards us is completely disregarding history, and another example of people buying propoganda that supports their point of view, no matter how ridiculous the claim is.

Republicans, Democrats, British, French, and Russians all share equal blame in this powder keg. I honestly don't see how any student of history can't point fingers at Bush and immediately excuse everyone else's involvement.

You want to slam Bush? Fine, even though I'm sick of seeing half of these pictures up here. But give equal stage time to rest of the fucks responsible for all of this anger, and hey, here's an idea: direct some of that aggression towards the madmen that attacked our country and killed our innocents.

Finally, how does a picture of Bush 'shopped to look like a monkey make any kind of coherent political argument, anyway? These are the tools of the politically inept.