"and let's not forget the US, if it wasn't for this capitalist society China wouldn't have nowhere near what they have, so, communism is feeding off of capitalism in a very cancerous way, that "great" communist society doesn't even have safety or give a shit in the least for their own people, those people are just systematic slaves."

who in China now owns all of the production, and who in the American empire owns all of the production...
China is not just the bourgeois class, nor any nation is just that class, so when you say that china has more now due to the coup after Mao's death incited by the American imperialists, you're failing to look at that nation as a whole
and to say that American people are free is just the same... only the bourgeois have any rights, as is the case with any capitalist nation

as for history of communist countries the really has never been such a thing... and why is it that socialism keeps failing? other than the fact that the capitalist empire keeps attempting coups against nations where the people are making this great leap forward, other than the bourgeois reactionaries within them that work tirelessly to sabotage the progress? what of the shortcomings of the people themselves, but also the great leaps they have accomplished... the latest coup the u.s. imperialists attempted didn't last, the people marched on the mansion just after three days and ran the new CIA puppet government out... yet in that nation they also fail to have a good criticism of this oil plan...



"only through the dictatorship of the proletariat class can there really be a true democracy, because only the proletariat is truly of the people, and therefor for the people"
actually i typed that, didn't proof read it however...
i know that the word dictatorship invokes images of Mussolini, and Hitler, but the fact is all of the types of governments are dictatorships... but how do you consider a people that are under a dictatorship of a small handful of people that own all of the means of production, giving the rest of the people the right to work, and only when it is most profitable to the bourgeois(ruling class); how are the people free? in a sense that is nothing but slavery
and what about democracy, how is this a democracy when only the bourgeois really have the right to vote because this "democracy", this farce of a democracy, is not run by ballots filled out by the general masses, rather is run by the outward expression of capital; money
the less wealth that you have, the less freedom you have

so to this:
If you think we can only achieve social change and progress as people by empowering a dictator I gotta seriously wonder where such logic could possibly be coming from. The current administration has moved us closer to being within a dictatorship than I think we've ever been and you think that's a good thing ?

empowering(or allowing the continuation of power being held by) only the wealthiest ten percent of the population that only their real interest is to make as much wealth for themselves and continue to exploit people, how is that freedom? if the majority actually had a say, if the amount of wealth you had didn't matter when it came to ruling the nation, and yourself how is that not free? it would probably be safe to assume that the old white men(some of them, most of them had no intention on creating a free nation actually) indeed wanted a dictatorship of the proletariat... the majority
that is all that means

Marx said that "democracy is the road toward socialism"
he was indeed correct with that statement, why do you think that democracy has been so completely sabotaged?
and yet they wish to continue the show that these fake elections are... so the masses will continue to think that they are free, better off... so they won't rise up, which is either going to happen really soon, or this will wind up like an Orwellian nightmare
if the first is true, which is what we all should be encouraging and exciting people to do, then this Marxist-Leninist-Maoist ideology should be used to prepare them, do away with the system of the old, and work to ensure that it does not return