Are you sure you want to report this post?
Re: Image comments for 2009 Inaugural Celebration
Posted by: Lexx
Date: 21/01/2009 07:15PM
Fox was the only major news network to report on how biased the coverage of the other networks can get.
When Bush was inagurated he spent less than 1/3 of what was spent on this latest little party.
Back then the "main stream" media reported it as extravagant, absurd and a total misuse of tax payer income.
Back then the economy was in much better shape than it is now and our government wasn't nearly as in debt.
But now those same people are saying Obama deserves it. Things like paying for heating grates on the platform so he doesn't get cold and all the other outrageous expendetures paid for with taxes are needed because this is such a momentous event.
So which number do you really think is more accurate?
You may optionally give an explanation for why this post was reported, which will be sent to the moderators along with the report. This can help the moderator to understand why you reported the post.
