Report
Are you sure you want to report this post?

Re: Image comments for A Voice of Reason in the Wilderness of Insanity
Posted by: Mrkim
Date: 20/07/2009 09:11PM
Ah, I knew the "entitlement" crap would pop its head up somewhere in all this. You have no more right to health care than you have a right to drive a car or many other things within the world that are PRIVLEDGES, not rights.

The Bill of Rights nor the US Constitution either one have any mentions of health care as a right. The right you do have in regards to health care is that if you can afford to get some, you may do so, end of story. Unless of course you're an illegal alien which then makes it illegal to not treat you FOR FRICKIN FREE! Makes me wanna switch up and start calling myself Senior Kim ..... NOT !

To claim it's "humane" is just psychobable meant to bend the ear of sympathetic types and bears no relation to any RIGHT at all. To believe it is your right to demand health care from the government inadvertently also does some thing else, it GIVES UP your right to choose that care for yourself. You can't let the government decide the health care for you and then complain about the care you receive. You can do one or the other, but you don't get to do both.

One thing the sheeple are forgettin in all this is that the deeper and deeper we ask and then expect the government to involve themselves in our lives comes at a cost, and that cost is of our freedoms as a individual. The more one expects of the government, the less one gets to choose for themselves. I like less government and more individual choices instead of the other way around.

In the OBAMACARE ads that are running trying to tug on the sympathetic side within us all the characters/stories portray only one side of the story. No where will you see any mention of the people who have health care and feel satisfied with it, or at least would like to keep what they have now, only the worst case scenario side of the issue is shown which hardly leads to anything like an honest and open portrayal of the issue as a whole.

To the above mention of paying in $10 a month per person and $10 per visit let me just say this. IF such a system were in place that same $10 per month is likely about what it would take to even begin to administer such a mammoth undertaking meaning we'd be paying for nothing but overhead for the system and then the government would STILL send $$ to the health care providers at a loss to the American public. Another fine example of how deficit spending works totally lost

smoking smiley

You may optionally give an explanation for why this post was reported, which will be sent to the moderators along with the report. This can help the moderator to understand why you reported the post.