Your semantical attack on my verbage does absolutely nothing in making a case for an opposing view of what is or isn't truth. Are my statements filled with my personal perspective, of course, but that in no way means the underlying message is any less valid simply because you choose to take semantical exception to the way they're put forth.

I guess the bottom line is that since you have no dog in this fight it's easy to sit 1/2 way around the world and take this all with a grain of salt. If I came across a discussion about a political struggle amongst you guys in Kiwiland I would never comment at all unless I felt knowledgeable enough on all sides of the discussion to do so.

Knowing enough about the issues involved here to reasonably comment on this topic is obviously not your strong suit, which you've made abundantly clear. With that in mind my question to you is, what if any is your point in even entering into this discussion except if your point is really only to show how little indeed you are aware of

I notice the only lib on here even willing to stick up for Obozo wasn't willing to do so more than once and PJ just sat on the sidelines and then added a snarky bit of bullshit about others having made the effort to even discuss this issue at length. That's easy enough to understand though with Obozo now gettin it from all sides it's pretty hard for even his supporters to pipe up in defense of his failing tactics