Whom makes the judgement and against what measures?

I mean, the Greeks invented it, the Scandinavians had something very similar that was regularly corrupted by social networks between key families, it functions best with rule of law and that's being subverted seemingly all over the place (the EU is calling something like China's 'rule by law' 'rule of law') and that's resulting in protests and the suppression of dissent seemingly everywhere. It also seems to work best with a constitutional monarchy as a balance of power, but idiots deny the two can co-exist, when they have for centuries.

Then there's the fact that the most violent pretend democracies always deny their subjects government departments that record and issue documentation for land - if you don't have documentation for land someone else can come along and seize it. It makes a violent and less honest society that is at odds with each other, whilst the children of the elite live in luxury, Swiss bank accounts swell up and the population live in poverty.

A little clarification please. Or a lot of clarification.