pulse Report This Comment
Date: April 21, 2024 12:10PM

Yeah. It's fucking horrible.

Why do we need dynamic pages anyway? What was wrong with static html?

Jerks the lot of 'em.

Anon Report This Comment
Date: April 27, 2024 07:40AM

Why didn't you just stay with static? The amount of data transfer for the same web browsing these days is incredible - and stupid.

pulse Report This Comment
Date: April 27, 2024 11:46AM

Because static HTML takes us back to the days where there's a webmaster and that's it. Every image would be uploaded and programmed in by me.

Pass

Edit: For reference though, this is a very small page. We add a few kilobytes above what the image size is in code. About 1-2 seconds on a 56k dialup modem + image load time.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27/04/2024 11:47AM by pulse.

Anon Report This Comment
Date: April 27, 2024 11:18PM

I wasn't complaining about plus613. Yesterday I browsed the afr, dailywail, deepdreamgenerator and here. 120mgs in the browser cache. 10 minutes.