aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: February 25, 2006 08:40PM
Well W .. you've got a lot of time left to overtake Johnson. You have proven you
can fuck up with the best of them.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: February 25, 2006 10:03PM
You know beast, if someone gave you a brain cell it would be lonely.
John_Stone Report This Comment Date: February 25, 2006 10:19PM
If someone gave you a good rejoinder, you wouldn't know what to do with it.
The_truths_STILL_a_bitch_aint_ Report This Comment Date: February 26, 2006 09:23AM
He's a stupid fuck, case closed. The right wingnuts need to get of their party
arrogance and admit he was a mistake.
This nation hasn't been in worse shape since the Vietnam war, (or before that
the depression) and the reason is the American Electorate (Still 52% dumber than
an ACTUAL BAG OF HAMMERS)is still too stupid to know what it does wrong, when it
does it.
And that is why this nation is now feared instead of respected. The right wing
mantra (The government is a stupid giant)has come to life and kissed them on the
lips with the same aroma that THEY THEMSELVES have imbued it with.
Democrats might be more ineffectual because of their idealism, but it also means
they're less harmful. If they get their head out of their ass and stop making
their version of the "right wing" mistake (letting minorities and
special interest buy "pork barrel" legislation)thereby gutting the
nations "commonwealth", we MIGHT still survive.
But I'm not holding my breath.
If this culture gets any dumber and arrogant, (dangerous combination) this big
sign that the Bush administration has painted on our collective foreheads
(PLEASE FUCK WITH US, WE CAN'T EVEN RUN OUR OWN GOVERNMENT, MUCH LESS
YOURS!)will continue to invite disaster.
And as they used to say in the movies. "It rides a fast horse".
jgoins Report This Comment Date: February 26, 2006 10:56AM
Democrats might be more ineffectual because of their idealism, but it also
means they're less harmful.
---------------
And this is why they allow us to be attacked.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: February 27, 2006 05:05AM
jgoins .. Bush let the US get attacked. He held up the fighter jets to down the
planes.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: March 12, 2006 10:21PM
would you like to go down in history as the president who purposely killed 500
people because you thought the planes were going to be used as bombs? there's no
way we would've known and proved for sure un the short time we did know that
those planes were going into the wtc.
unless of course you claim the conspiracy theory of we knew in advance what was
going on all along.
which i'm sure you'll pull that card, it's your only defense.
jeef Report This Comment Date: April 03, 2006 03:14PM
jgoins the US did not get atacked becuase the democrats were less harmful,
you stoopid dumb fuk.
America is seen as the most potentialy harmful plase on earth too, dont deny it
